I do pay a subscription, as I am curious and like to see what's happening on the PS side of things. I am left still wondering why the reviewer could not find anything better than that to report on the GIMP. I wanted to add mine to the list of comments following the article, and registered to do just that only to find that the comment section was closed for the article (written in 2015). Obviously, the article could not deal with any of these applications in depth and still cover all 25 of them, but there were decent comments about all 25 except for Gimp which was described as being full of features, but not as user friendly as most. Why is this? Just yesterday, I came across an article listing 25 free editing applications for those who don't want to "pay a subscription fee". Over the years, I have perused many an article comparing the relative merits of one editing application over another, and, it seems, whenever Gimp is mentioned, there is a chorus of comments about how steep is the learning curve. I guess it shouldn't matter to me what the general consensus is on editing applications, but, I confess, it matters to me. After watching a couple of tutorials, the workflow became clear, and now, I am an enthusiastic user of that application as well.
Gimp for windows xp 32 bit free download how to#
My first attempts were not unlike previous sessions toying with the application, no real direction on how to proceed. I had previously toyed with Darktable, but, since it was packaged with Gimp, decided to spend some time with it. That Gimp version also was packaged with Darktable as a RAW image plugin. I recently installed Gimp 2.9.7 on my system, and I am thrilled with the steps forward in that version (runs solid on my Ubuntu 17.10 system). Before that, I used Micrographix Picture Publisher, a very capable photo editor not at all dissimilar to GIMP/PS (whatever happened to them?). I've been a PS user during the same time (and currently am a subscriber to CC).
0 kommentar(er)
